source: reuters, h/t @cigolo
From 2009 to 2012, average real income per family grew modestly by 6.0% (Table 1) but the gains were very uneven. Top 1% incomes grew by 31.4% while bottom 99% incomes grew only by 0.4%. Hence, the top 1% captured 95% of the income gains in the first two years of the recovery.
The top percentile share declined during WWI, recovered during the 1920s boom, and declined again during the great depression and WWII. This very specific timing, together with the fact that very high incomes account for a disproportionate share of the total decline in inequality, strongly suggests that the shocks incurred by capital owners during 1914 to 1945 (depression and wars) played a key role. Indeed, from 1913 and up to the 1970s, very top incomes were mostly composed of capital income (mostly dividend income) and to a smaller extent business income, the wage income share being very modest.
The evidence suggests that top incomes earners today are not “rentiers” deriving their incomes from past wealth but rather are “working rich,” highly paid employees or new entrepreneurs who have not yet accumulated fortunes comparable to those accumulated during the Gilded Age.
«The eurozone economy contracted for the sixth successive quarter at the start of 2013, with gross domestic product declining 0.2% in the three months to March. The economy has now shrunk 1.5% since peaking in the third quarter of 2011 in a double-dip recession that leaves the economy still 3.4% lower than its pre-crisis peak. […] The growing divergence in economic performance within the region is further highlighted by the fact that only Germany has seen its economy expand to a size exceeding its pre-crisis peak. Since the crisis struck, Germany’s economy has managed to grow by 1.3%, which is itself a depressingly small expansion to have seen over a five-year period, but represents a marked contrast to the fact that the Italian and Spanish economies remain some 8.6% and 6.9% smaller. The French economy has likewise failed to regain its pre-crisis peak, though is a mere 0.8% smaller.»